« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 18, 2008

Tragedy at the Cemetery Points to Larger Issue

On Sunday a young man who has sworn to protect and serve this community faced his worst nightmare. In what should have been a quiet and peaceful cemetery on a beautiful Sunday afternoon, he faced the tragedy of a deranged middle aged woman with a loaded gun who seemed set on violence. While he is certainly justified in his action, we can be sure that he will always remember that moment with regret. It should not however, be a regret of his actions. He had no other choice and I for one, am happy that he was there, instead of an unarmed citizen who could have become yet another victim of senseless violence. The regret is how often this situation occurs and is likely to occur again.

We do not know of the history of this woman but it appears from her behavior that she was another victim of mental illness and a society that chooses to ignore the segment of the population suffering from such maladies. As a pastor I have often dealt with people who need help but the very illness they have prevents them from seeking it and society is so preoccupied with personal freedoms that it refuses to step in to intervene. Various ailments from schizophrenia to severe bipolar disorder can be treated with available medicines but very often, when in the clutch of their disorder, those in need of treatment refuse it and those who recognize the problem find themselves helpless to intervene.

The recent shootings in Illinois are illustrative of the problem. This young man appeared normal and well adjusted to fellow students. Indeed, he was, just as long as he stayed on his medication. It is likely that, as so often happens, the medication worked so well that he decided he no longer needed to take it and, perhaps due to side effects, decided he could do without them. Very often drugs of this type diminish sexual drive which a young person especially could find very frustrating. Once off the drugs his illness would have made him unable to recognize the danger and unwilling to return to his previous medicated state. Very often the illness kicks in with overly high self esteem, paranoia, and flights of fantasy. The woman in the Paradise cemetery said she was a secret agent for the President of the United States.

The problem is that even family members are helpless to do anything. It is usually only after the mentally ill person gets into trouble several times that one can expect any help from authorities. If lucky they may find themselves in a mandatory treatment program. I have witnessed these programs in Southern California, ordered by a judge after several arrests of the sick person, but have not heard of the same being available locally. More often the sick person finds themselves in prison among the general population. They may receive treatment in prison because authorities find it easier to control a medicated population, but once released they, and society, are again on their own.

There needs to be a way to have those who are most obviously affected by psychological illness to be evaluated and put on a mandatory drug program or, if needed, put into secured housing. We don’t need to return to the abuses so common in the sixties when California mental institutions were seen as a warehouse solution for those we would rather not deal with, but there needs to be a method for those who clearly are a danger to themselves and others. There are several people in this area that I worry about and the police are helpless to do anything until a crime is committed. Unfortunately it appears that this local police officer was put into such a situation on what should have been a beautiful Sunday afternoon. In his case he was trained, armed and took appropriate action. The Illinois tragedy shows what happens when the same situation occurs among unarmed civilians.

There will be an investigation of the cemetery incident. If the facts as presented hold out, then this officer should be commended for a job well done. There is no such thing as “shooting to wound” in the heat of the moment and hand guns are not so accurate as to allow such flights of fantasy. With a loaded gun pointed at him, there was no chance for other less violent reactions. Providing the investigation backs up the evident facts, the officer should be commended and I hope he stays active in the local force. We should all, however, make our voices heard concerning the mentally ill. There are people in our community who need help and we need to make that help available. We need to protect their rights but we also need to protect our citizens. In the case of someone who has lost touch with reality, acts erratically, and poises a threat; we need a means to intervene before someone else gets hurt.

In this tragedy there are two primary victims. One is the woman who was shot as she appears to have been mentally ill, and the other is the officer who was forced to use such deadly force. Other victims include the families of both, one which suffers from a loss they were unable to prevent and the other from the strain such an incident puts on the officer and those who love him. We should pray for them all and for a society that is able to respond to the needs of the mentally ill with compassion and sensible intervention.

There is one other possibility. That is that the woman did not suffer from mental illness but from the affects of illegal or abused drugs. That would make it even more of a tragedy for all involved. It should also be a wake up call for young people who are thinking of experimenting with drugs for a high. The consequences are often not at all foreseeable and very often are tragic. We can all not only pray for young people to avoid such abuse but also model for them through our own respect and avoidance of mind altering drugs, including the abuse of alcohol. Small steps in the wrong direction can lead to horrible tragedies. Practicing what we preach can help many avoid that direction all together.

February 06, 2008

Alone in the Political Wilderness

As a conservative I usually look to the Republican Party for political leadership in the causes I care most about. These are moral issues such as being pro-life, preserving marriage for heterosexual couples as a means to strengthen families, not funding infant embryo research, and keeping government out of our private lives. Unfortunately, I now seem to find myself adrift and without a party to represent me.

What has the California Republican Party supported lately? Was it a conservative candidate? Was it conservative moral ideals or less intrusive government? Was it less taxation and more individual freedom? No, the Republican Party contacted me not to support any of these causes. Instead the party asked me to support those referendums to support Indian casinos in return for more tax revenue. When did a political party care more about filling the coffers of government than getting its members elected? Why should I support a party which now declares the most important thing to be allowing casinos to fleece the poor and elderly of their money so the government can have more to spend?

It seems we are headed for the same scenario on a national level as John McCain, one who has stood in interference of conservative causes for years, seems about ready to win the party’s nomination. Where does a conservative turn to? Who supports my causes? Part of my Christian responsibility lends itself to the political leadership of this country. Who do I vote for that will best represent my causes? McCain, Obama, and Clinton seem to be unlikely candidates to represent me, especially since pro-choice Republicans have recently endorsed McCain.

I believe that, if given the choice, I will vote for Obama over McCain. I expect the same lack of representation from the three of them but do fear Clinton’s mean spirit enough to vote against her. If Obama makes it though, I see little difference between him and McCain and in support of my causes but at least he would be a breath of fresh air in our political system, would overcome long standing racial barriers, and would perhaps bring some healing to our society. I would also avoid rewarding McCain for the damage he has done over the years.

As for my causes, I can best help myself by looking beyond the presidency and looking to support those in the House of Representatives and the Senate that support my causes. This will keep whoever is President from running wild with our rights or wildly expanding the government. I may not have a representative in the Presidency but on a lower level maybe conservatives can put in a block and wait this bad time out. I lived through the Carter years so I can make it through this time as well. It is not a good place to be in the political world but it is the reality of the situation.

In the end I take solace in being able to place the whole mess in God’s hands. I do what I can, little as it may be. I have to believe that God is in charge and will somehow, as He has done so often in the past, make good on the poor choices made by His people.


Father Steven Foppiano

Okay, I bow to the popular opinion and admit to being temporarily deranged for considering a vote for Obama. When it comes down to it I will probably hold my nose and vote for McCain, as much as I dislike his self serving stances against conservative legislation in the past. But I have to admit that for a person who promises everything without really saying anything about how he would accomplish it, Obama does inspire. His age, his manner of speaking, and his minority status make him seem like a good choice to many who would love to see the power structure shook up a bit. Unfortunately what ideals he does espouse make him a very dangerous man, especially if these ideals are overlooked in favor of his charisma. I would love to see a black president, but I will wait for Conda Lisa Rice to run. Now there is an intelligent conservative, probably better qualified than any who ran for the nomination, who will have my vote if she ever runs for an office. Maybe McCain will choose her as a running mate. That would certianly get me excited about the Republican ticket and would turn my vote from one of reluctance to one of enthusiasm.

February 03, 2008

Ahhh Politics

It is typical of my political luck that by the time I get to vote the choice seems to have already been made. Such is my situation this year with my favorite candidates having already dropped out of the race. What now?

Being a conservative, I would never vote for returning a Clinton to office but I must admit that I am intrigued by Obama. He is a fresh face. Although I know better than to think he is above the usual political maneuvering, he is certainly less beholden to others and to the political powers to be than Clinton and certainly has less baggage.

McCain has worked against his own party for so long; voting against many Republican initiatives, forming the “gang of 14” to stop Republican legislation when they controlled Congress, always willing to speak as a liberal when he knew it would gain him media attention, and forming a coalition with Kennedy to give amnesty to illegal aliens, that I am loath to reward him now with my vote. If he is the Republican nominee, then list me as undecided.

I may well end up voting for him. It will probably come down to his stance on moral issues such as abortion. If he is the nominee and is pro-life, then he will have my vote. If he is up against Hillary, he will have my vote, but if he is of the same mind as Obama when it comes to abortion and is up against him in the general election, then I think I would give my vote to Obama.

What it comes down to is that this is a year of poor political choices, at least as far as I am concerned. I can only hope that we have some better candidates on the horizon but haven’t seen the signs of any yet. Where are the future leaders of our country?